Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032794›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2022

Endofemoral Shooting Technique for Removing Well-fixed Cementless Stems.

Kenichi Oe, Hirokazu Iida, Takashi Toyoda, Tomohisa Nakamura, Naofumi Okamoto, Takanori Saito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenichi OeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu IidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi ToyodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohisa NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Naofumi OkamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Takanori SaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The removal of a well-fixed cementless stem poses technical challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of our endofemoral extraction technique established in 2001. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2016, 118 consecutive revisions following bipolar or total hip arthroplasty, which required cementless femoral stem removal, were performed at our institution. This retrospective study evaluated 106 patients (108 hips) who were followed up for a mean of 9.2 years (range, 5-20 years). The patients included 15 men and 91 women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 33-87 years). Endofemoral extracted stem removal was performed as follows. Multiple Kirschner wires were sequentially inserted into the interface between the implant and cortical bone, after which the implant was detached using a thin chisel. After the cementless stem was removed, it was replaced with a cemented stem using an autograft, as needed. Radiological loosening of the femoral stem was defined as definite or probable loosening, based on the criteria of Harris et al. Prosthesis survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the endpoint set as repeat revision surgery for stem loosening or femoral fracture. Results: Re-revision surgery was performed in 7 hips. Stem loosening was observed in 4 hips, and the mean subsidence was 0.3 mm (0-3 mm). The 10-year survival rate was 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 93.2-100). Conclusions: Our technique for removing well-fixed cementless stems yielded successful results.

Indexed as

Cementless stemEndofemoral removalExtraction of femoral stemFemoral revisionTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36032794
PMCPMC9399389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.