Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032737›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Translational potential of base-editing tools for gene therapy of monogenic diseases.

Vasiliy V Reshetnikov, Angelina V Chirinskaite, Julia V Sopova, Roman A Ivanov, Elena I Leonova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Therapeutic Innovations for Monkeypox Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Clinical hematopoietic stem cell-based gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasiliy V ReshetnikovDepartment of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia.
Angelina V ChirinskaiteСenter of Transgenesis and Genome Editing, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Julia V SopovaСenter of Transgenesis and Genome Editing, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Roman A IvanovDepartment of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia.
Elena I LeonovaСenter of Transgenesis and Genome Editing, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide have rare genetic diseases that are caused by various mutations in DNA sequence. Classic treatments of rare genetic diseases are often ineffective, and therefore great hopes are placed on gene-editing methods. A DNA base-editing system based on nCas9 (Cas9 with a nickase activity) or dCas9 (a catalytically inactive DNA-targeting Cas9 enzyme) enables editing without double-strand breaks. These tools are constantly being improved, which increases their potential usefulness for therapies. In this review, we describe the main types of base-editing systems and their application to the treatment of monogenic diseases in experiments

Indexed as

base editingdCas9gene therapymonogenic diseasenCas9prime editor

Identifiers

PMID36032737
PMCPMC9399415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.