Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032678›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Medical terminology-based computing system: a lightweight post-processing solution for out-of-vocabulary multi-word terms.

Nadia Saeed, Hammad Naveed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadia SaeedComputational Biology Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES-FAST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hammad NaveedComputational Biology Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES-FAST), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linguistic rules of medical terminology assist in gaining acquaintance with rare/complex clinical and biomedical terms. The medical language follows a Greek and Latin-inspired nomenclature. This nomenclature aids the stakeholders in simplifying the medical terms and gaining semantic familiarity. However, natural language processing models misrepresent rare and complex biomedical words. In this study, we present MedTCS-a lightweight, post-processing module-to simplify hybridized or compound terms into regular words using medical nomenclature. MedTCS enabled the word-based embedding models to achieve 100% coverage and enabled the BiowordVec model to achieve high correlation scores (0.641 and 0.603 in UMNSRS similarity and relatedness datasets, respectively) that significantly surpass the n-gram and sub-word approaches of FastText and BERT. In the downstream task of named entity recognition (NER), MedTCS enabled the latest clinical embedding model of FastText-OA-All-300d to improve the F1-score from 0.45 to 0.80 on the BC5CDR corpus and from 0.59 to 0.81 on the NCBI-Disease corpus, respectively. Similarly, in the drug indication classification task, our model was able to increase the coverage by 9% and the F1-score by 1%. Our results indicate that incorporating a medical terminology-based module provides distinctive contextual clues to enhance vocabulary as a post-processing step on pre-trained embeddings. We demonstrate that the proposed module enables the word embedding models to generate vectors of out-of-vocabulary words effectively. We expect that our study can be a stepping stone for the use of biomedical knowledge-driven resources in NLP.

Indexed as

biomedical nomenclaturelinguistic approachmedical terminologynamed entity recognitionnatural language processingout-of-vocabulary

Identifiers

PMID36032678
PMCPMC9411640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.