Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032675›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

An Automated Approach to Assess Relative Galectin-Glycan Affinity Following Glycan Microarray Analysis.

Alex D Ho, Shang-Chuen Wu, Nourine A Kamili, Anna V Blenda, Richard D Cummings, Sean R Stowell, Connie M Arthur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of Galectin Binding to Blood Group Expressing Bacteria.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Use of Microbial Microarrays to Define Antibody Specificity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Expression and Characterization of Blood Group Binding Lectins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chemical biology tools to probe bacterial glycans.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2024
    Review
  8. The role of glycosylation in clinical allergy and immunology.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex D HoJoint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Shang-Chuen WuJoint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Nourine A KamiliJoint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Anna V BlendaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC, United States.
Richard D CummingsDepartment of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Sean R StowellJoint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Connie M ArthurJoint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM142617 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jason Yustein · 2022 to 2026
$7.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have highlighted the utility of glycan microarray analysis for the elucidation of protein-glycan interactions. However, most current glycan microarray studies analyze glycan binding protein (GBP)-glycan interactions at a single protein concentration. While this approach provides useful information related to a GBP's overall binding capabilities, extrapolation of true glycan binding preferences using this method fails to account for printing variations or other factors that may confound relative binding. To overcome this limitation, we examined glycan array binding of three galectins over a range of concentrations to allow for a more complete assessment of binding preferences. This approach produced a richer data set than single concentration analysis and provided more accurate identification of true glycan binding preferences. However, while this approach can be highly informative, currently available data analysis approaches make it impractical to perform binding isotherms for each glycan present on currently available platforms following GBP evaluation. To overcome this limitation, we developed a method to directly optimize the efficiency of assessing association constants following multi-GBP concentration glycan array analysis. To this end, we developed programs that automatically analyze raw array data (kdMining) to generate output graphics (kaPlotting) following array analysis at multiple doses. These automatic programing methods reduced processing time from 32.8 h to 1.67 min. Taken together, these results demonstrate an effective approach to glycan array analysis that provides improved detail and efficiency when compared to previous methods.

Indexed as

dissociation constantgalectinmicroarraypythonR studio

Identifiers

PMID36032675
PMCPMC9403319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.