ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Direct characterization of tissue dynamics with laser speckle contrast imaging.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed neural network for mapping vascular and tissue dynamics using laser speckle contrast imaging.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Choice of numerical implementation of spatial contrast calculation impacts microcirculation quantitation in laser speckle contrast imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Laser speckle contrast imaging with principal component and entropy analysis: a novel approach for depth-independent blood flow assessment.Frontiers of optoelectronics · 2025Article
- Non-invasive laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) of extra-embryonic blood vessels in intact avian eggs at early developmental stages.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Combining near infrared fluorescence and laser speckle imaging with optical tissue clearing for in vivo transcranial monitoring of cerebral blood vessels damaged by photodynamic nanoformulation.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Dynamic light scattering and laser speckle contrast imaging of the brain: theory of the spatial and temporal statistics of speckle pattern evolution.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Choosing a polarisation configuration for dynamic light scattering and laser speckle contrast imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Optimizing the precision of laser speckle contrast imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Measurements of slow tissue dynamics with short-separation speckle contrast optical spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Design and validation of a convolutional neural network for fast, model-free blood flow imaging with multiple exposure speckle imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Quasi-analytic solution for real-time multi-exposure speckle imaging of tissue perfusion.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Adaptive window space direction laser speckle contrast imaging to improve vascular visualization.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- A quasi-analytic solution for real-time multi-exposure speckle imaging of tissue perfusion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Correcting sampling bias in speckle contrast imaging.Optics letters · 2022Article
- Adaptive Feature Extraction for Blood Vessel Segmentation and Contrast Recalculation in Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) has gained broad appeal as a technique to monitor tissue dynamics (broadly defined to include blood flow dynamics), in part because of its remarkable simplicity. When laser light is backscattered from a tissue, it produces speckle patterns that vary in time. A measure of the speckle field decorrelation time provides information about the tissue dynamics. In conventional LSCI, this measure requires numerical fitting to a specific theoretical model for the field decorrelation. However, this model may not be known a priori, or it may vary over the image field of view. We describe a method to reconstruct the speckle field decorrelation time that is completely model free, provided that the measured speckle dynamics are ergodic. We also extend our approach to allow for the possibility of non-ergodic measurements caused by the presence of a background static speckle field. In both ergodic and non-ergodic cases, our approach accurately retrieves the correlation time without any recourse to numerical fitting and is largely independent of camera exposure time. We apply our method to tissue phantom and
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.