Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032555›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2022

Machine-Learning Rationalization and Prediction of Solid-State Synthesis Conditions.

Haoyan Huo, Christopher J Bartel, Tanjin He, Amalie Trewartha, Alexander Dunn, Bin Ouyang, Anubhav Jain, Gerbrand Ceder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leading the Pack: Next-Generation Batteries for Humanoid Robotics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Text Mining of CVD Synthesis Recipes for 2D Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advancing materials science through next-generation machine learning.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haoyan HuoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-9121
Christopher J BartelDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-5036
Tanjin HeDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-8703
Amalie TrewarthaMaterials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Alexander DunnDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Bin OuyangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8181-6815
Anubhav JainEnergy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-9967
Gerbrand CederDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9275-3605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There currently exist no quantitative methods to determine the appropriate conditions for solid-state synthesis. This not only hinders the experimental realization of novel materials but also complicates the interpretation and understanding of solid-state reaction mechanisms. Here, we demonstrate a machine-learning approach that predicts synthesis conditions using large solid-state synthesis data sets text-mined from scientific journal articles. Using feature importance ranking analysis, we discovered that optimal heating temperatures have strong correlations with the stability of precursor materials quantified using melting points and formation energies (Δ

Identifiers

PMID36032555
PMCPMC9407029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.