Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032470›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2022

Turnaround time and barriers to treatment of newly diagnosed cancer in Uganda: a mixed-methods longitudinal study.

Solomon Kibudde, Eve Namisango, Annet Nakaganda, Mackuline Atieno, Joy Bbaale, Martin Nabwana, Fatia Kiyange, Meg O'brien, Emmanuel Bk Luyirika, Jackson Orem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of different post-operative treatment modalities on long-term outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Solomon KibuddeUganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Eve NamisangoAfrican Palliative Care Association, Entebbe, Uganda.
Annet NakagandaUganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Mackuline AtienoAfrican Palliative Care Association, Entebbe, Uganda.
Joy BbaaleSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences.
Martin NabwanaUganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Fatia KiyangeAfrican Palliative Care Association, Entebbe, Uganda.
Meg O'brienAfrican Palliative Care Association, Entebbe, Uganda.
Emmanuel Bk LuyirikaAfrican Palliative Care Association, Entebbe, Uganda.
Jackson OremUganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer represents a growing public health concern. Late-stage at diagnosis, limited access to effective treatment, and loss to follow-up are responsible for dismal outcomes. Objective: To describe care pathways, turnaround times, and identify barriers to timely initiation of cancer treatment. Methods: Using a sequential mixed-methods design involving focus group discussions, we followed up 50 participants between January, and June 2018. We computed the median observed turnaround time to treatment (TTT) at each care step and reported delay as deviations from the proposed ideal turnaround times. Results: The ideal TTT with either chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, or surgery was 8, 14, and 21 days respectively. At a median follow-up time of 35.5 days (IQR 17-66), only 29 of the 50 study participants had completed all steps between registration and initiation of treatment, and the observed median TTT was 16 days (9 - 22 days) for chemotherapy, and 30 days (17 - 49 days) for radiotherapy, reflecting a significant delay (p-value = 0.017). Reported barriers were; shortage of specialists, patients required visits to outside facilities for staging investigations, prohibitive costs, poor navigation system and time wastage. Conclusions: When compared to the recommended ideal turnaround time, there was significant institutional delay in access to chemotherapy and radiotherapy attributed to multiple external and internal healthcare system barriers.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesTime-to-TreatmentUgandabarrierscancerstepsTurnaround timeUgandawaiting time

Identifiers

PMID36032470
PMCPMC9382503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.