Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032422›Full record

ArticleLeukemia research reports2022

High incidence of minor and micro breakpoints in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia with additional cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis - the Western Australian series.

Emily Leung, Rebecca de Kraa, Alison Louw, Julian P Cooney

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily LeungSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Rebecca de KraaPathWest Laboratory Medicine, Western Australia, Australia.
Alison LouwPathWest Laboratory Medicine, Western Australia, Australia.
Julian P CooneySchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) is defined by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome, a balanced translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 that results in the constitutively active tyrosine kinase, BCR-ABL1. Additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) at diagnosis occur in 5-10% of CML patients, and are important for prognosis. They are classified as major or minor route. The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency and type of ACAs in 193 newly diagnosed CML patients, and to evaluate patient characteristics, treatment response, and survival. Methods: Medical records, in conjunction with data from the PathWest cytogenetics and molecular laboratories, were analysed. Results: ACAs were present in 14 (7.3%) of patients at diagnosis. Seven patients had major-route abnormalities, with additional chromosome 8 (+8) the most common. All patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Three patients presented in blast crisis; two patients have died. Of note, there was a high incidence of the rare minor and micro BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts. Conclusions: Frequency of ACAs at diagnosis was similar to that of previous reports. These patients consist a higher-risk cohort, and require individualised treatment, with consideration of frontline and secondary TKIs, adjunct chemotherapy, novel agents, and allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Indexed as

ACA, Additional chromosomal abnormalitiesAdditional chromosomal abnormalitiesChronic Myeloid LeukaemiaCML, Chronic myeloid leukaemiaCytogeneticsLeukaemiaTKI, Tyrosine kinase inhibitorTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36032422
PMCPMC9411674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.