Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032394›Full record

ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2020

Safeguards for Using Viral Vector Systems in Human Gene Therapy: A Resource for Biosafety Professionals Mitigating Risks in Health Care Settings.

Alex M Brown, Jill Blind, Katie Campbell, Sumit Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A Changing World in Gene Therapy Research: Exciting Opportunities for Medical Advancement and Biosafety Challenges.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex M BrownDepartment of Research Safety, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jill BlindDepartment of Pharmacy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Katie CampbellDepartment of Research Safety, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sumit GhoshDepartment of Research Safety, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-954X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health care workers who work daily with human body fluids and hazardous drugs are among those at the highest risk of occupational exposure to these agents. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) prescribes safeguards to protect workers against health hazards related to bloodborne pathogens. Similarly, the United States Pharmacopeia General Chapter 800 (USP <800>), a standard first published in February 2016 and implementation required by December 2019, addresses the occupational exposure risks of health care workers at organizations working with hazardous drugs. With emerging technologies in the field of gene therapy, these occupational exposure risks to health care workers now extend beyond those associated with bloodborne pathogens and hazardous drugs and now include recombinant DNA. The fifth edition of the Methods: At the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, a comprehensive gap analysis was executed between the research and health care environment to develop a program for risk mitigation. The Results: The standards and guidelines for working with viral vector systems in a research laboratory environment were adapted to develop a program that will mitigate the risks to health care workers involved in the preparation, transportation, and administration of gene therapies as well as subsequent patient care activities. The gap analysis identified significant differences in technical language used in daily operations, work environment, training and education, disinfection practices, and policy development between research and health care settings. These differences informed decisions and helped the organization develop a collaborative framework for risk mitigation when a gene therapy product enters the health care setting. Discussion: With continuing advances in the field of gene therapy, the oversight structure needs to evolve for the health care setting. To deliver the best outcomes to the patients of these therapies, researchers, Institutional Biosafety Committees, and health care workers need to collaborate on training programs to safeguard the public trust in the use of this technology both in clinical trials and as FDA-approved therapeutics.

Indexed as

biosafetygap analysisgene therapyhealth care workersrisk mitigation

Identifiers

PMID36032394
PMCPMC9134636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.