ReviewApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2020
Environmental Health and Biosafety Risk Assessment Guidance for Commercial-Scale Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacturing.
Review in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosafety status analysis and risk assessment of laboratories from 2021 to 2023 in Jiaxing, China.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Environmental Health and Safety Offers a Biosafety Risk Assessment for a Theoretical Model of a Gene Therapy Process Transfer from Research and Development to Large-Scale Manufacturing.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This article aims to identify best practices, improve risk controls, and aid regulatory agencies in developing guidance for environmental and biosafety risk assessment for commercial-scale cell and gene therapy manufacturing. Methods: A cross-functional team should start with hazard classification and testing requirements for materials used or generated by the process and process hazard characterization. Results: The team develops a safety profile of the process to mitigate risks, including: product biological contamination risk and process controls, including raw materials, facilities, operator and environmental controls, and method of detection;a technical review of the process to evaluate the operational and engineering controls;monitoring systems to mitigate the risk of failure and/or breach of the system, preventing the release of material to the facility or operator exposure;site sanitization strategy and facility containment measures, including engineering designs, air handling systems, spill containment measures, surface cleanability, waste flows, and decontamination practices;a review of site practices, including process, employee, material and waste flows, staff training, controlled access, operator gowning, and emergency response plans/measures. Discussion: The cross-functional team should regularly reconvene to provide solutions for enhanced process control, process life-cycle management, monitor assumptions, and track performance. The plan must be revised following any relevant failure event or process change. Conclusion: A risk assessment template is shared to bring to the reader's attention the complexity of commercial-scale manufacturing, areas to assess, potential questions to ask, and other pertinent parties who may input to the risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.