Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Public stigma profile toward mental disorders across different university degrees in the University of Valencia (Spain).

Juan C Ruiz, Inmaculada Fuentes-Durá, Marta López-Gilberte, Carmen Dasí, Cristina Pardo-García, María C Fuentes-Durán, Francisco Pérez-González, Ladislao Salmeron, Pau Soldevila-Matías, Joan Vila-Francés and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stigma Toward Severe Mental Illness Among Healthcare Students: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan C RuizFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Inmaculada Fuentes-DuráFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Marta López-GilberteDepartment of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen DasíFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina Pardo-GarcíaDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
María C Fuentes-DuránFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco Pérez-GonzálezFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ladislao SalmeronFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pau Soldevila-MatíasFaculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Joan Vila-FrancésIntelligent Data Analysis Laboratory (IDAL), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Vicent Balanza-MartínezCenter for Biomedical Research in Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of studies carried out in recent years in different populations have shown that stigma toward mental disorders is highly prevalent. In the present study we conducted a comprehensive assessment of stigma to describe and compare stigma toward mental disorders in students enrolled in five different university degrees. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-five students from the University of Valencia (Spain), attending the second term of their first-degree courses in the faculties of medicine, psychology, teaching, economics, and data science participated in this cross-sectional study. Stigma was measured using: the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS), the Scale of Community Attitudes toward Mental Illness (CAMI), the Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-27), and the Knowledge about Mental Illness test (KMI). Results: We found different patterns of stigma according to gender, the fact of knowing or living with a person with mental disorders and the university degree studied. Overall, women show fewer stigmatizing attitudes than men but similar stereotypes and prejudice toward people with mental disorders. However, the pattern of results across degrees is more complex. Overall, students of medicine, psychology and teaching showed fewer stigmatizing attitudes than students of economics and data science but differences between degrees were more subtle in stereotypes and prejudice toward people with mental disorders. Conclusion: Our study suggests the existence of different profiles of stigma in relation to mental disorders in university students. These profiles varied in relation with the degree being studied, gender and already knowing or living with a person with mental disorders.

Indexed as

attitudesattributionsmental disordersprejudicestereotypingstigmauniversity students

Identifiers

PMID36032229
PMCPMC9411748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.