Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032141›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

CD4

Yunfeng Zhou, Haibo Zhang, Yao Yao, Xiaoyan Zhang, Youfei Guan, Feng Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yunfeng ZhouDepartment of Physiology, Medical Research Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Haibo ZhangAdvanced Institute for Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yao YaoDivision of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Xiaoyan ZhangWuhu Hospital & Health Science Center, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Youfei GuanAdvanced Institute for Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Feng ZhengAdvanced Institute for Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Dalian Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNEast China Normal University · CNShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a common pathological feature of end stage liver failure, a severe life-threatening disease worldwide. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), especially its more severe form with steatohepatitis (NASH), results from obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome and becomes a leading cause of liver fibrosis. Genetic factor, lipid overload/toxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation have all been implicated in the development and progression of NASH. Both innate immune response and adaptive immunity contribute to NASH-associated inflammation. Innate immunity may cause inflammation and subsequently fibrosis

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDisease ProgressionFibrosisHumansInflammationLiver CirrhosisT-Lymphocytes, Regulatoryadaptive immunityCD4+ T cellsinnate immune responseLiver fibrosisNASH

Identifiers

PMID36032141
PMCPMC9399803
OpenAlexW4293778079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.