Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

NanoNet: Rapid and accurate end-to-end nanobody modeling by deep learning.

Tomer Cohen, Matan Halfon, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nanobody-based analysis of RhoGTPase stress response inBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Finding antibodies in cryo-EM maps with CrAI.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in generative models for antibodies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. P-NADs:Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomer CohenThe Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Matan HalfonThe Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dina Schneidman-DuhovnyThe Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies are a rapidly growing class of therapeutics. Recently, single domain camelid VHH antibodies, and their recognition nanobody domain (Nb) appeared as a cost-effective highly stable alternative to full-length antibodies. There is a growing need for high-throughput epitope mapping based on accurate structural modeling of the variable domains that share a common fold and differ in the Complementarity Determining Regions (CDRs). We develop a deep learning end-to-end model, NanoNet, that given a sequence directly produces the 3D coordinates of the backbone and C

Indexed as

Deep LearningSingle-Domain AntibodiesAmino Acid SequenceAntibodiesComplementarity Determining RegionsAntibodiesComplementarity Determining RegionsSingle-Domain Antibodiesantibodydeep learning- artificial neural networkmachine-learning (ML)nanobody (Nb)protein modeling

Identifiers

PMID36032123
PMCPMC9411858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.