Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36031868›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Optimal ceftazidime/avibactam dosing exposure against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Vincent H Tam, Paul R Merlau, Cole S Hudson, Ellen G Kline, Brianna M Eales, James Smith, Amelia K Sofjan, Ryan K Shields

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent H TamDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX 77204, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-5376
Paul R MerlauDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Cole S HudsonDepartment of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Ellen G KlineDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Brianna M EalesDepartment of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
James SmithDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Amelia K SofjanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Ryan K ShieldsDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
University of Houston · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Personalized Antimicrobial Combinations to Combat ResistanceR01AI140287 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI VINCENT H TAM · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
Use of site-specific pharmacokinetics to optimize antibiotic combinations and prevent the emergence of resistance against CRER21AI151363 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIELDS, RYAN K · 2021 to 2022
$431k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140287NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI151363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInfections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are considered urgent public health threats and often treated with a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. However, clinical treatment failure and resistance emergence have been attributed to inadequate dosing. We used a novel framework to provide insights of optimal dosing exposure of ceftazidime/avibactam.

methodsSeven clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing different KPC variants were examined. Ceftazidime susceptibility (MIC) was determined by broth dilution using escalating concentrations of avibactam. The observed MICs were characterized as response to avibactam concentrations using an inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. Using the best-fit parameter values, %fT>MICi was estimated for various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam. A hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was subsequently used to ascertain the effectiveness of selected regimens over 120 h. The drug exposure threshold associated with bacterial suppression was identified by recursive partitioning.

resultsIn all scenarios, ceftazidime MIC reductions were well characterized with increasing avibactam concentrations. In HFIM, bacterial regrowth over time correlated with emergence of resistance. Overall, suppression of bacterial regrowth was associated with %fT>MICi ≥ 76.1% (100% versus 18.2%; P < 0.001). Using our framework, the optimal drug exposure could be achieved with ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g every 12 h in 5 out of 7 isolates. Furthermore, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g every 8 h can suppress an isolate deemed resistant based on conventional susceptibility testing method.

conclusionsAn optimal drug exposure to suppress KPC-producing bacteria was identified. The novel framework is informative and may be used to guide optimal dosing of other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Further in vivo investigations are warranted.

Indexed as

CeftazidimeKlebsiella InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesDrug CombinationsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsavibactamAzabicyclo CompoundsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesCeftazidimeDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID36031868
PMCPMC10205629
OpenAlexW4293676970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.