ArticleCancer medicine2023
Prognostic risk assessment model for alternative splicing events and splicing factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive systems biology analysis reveals splicing factor contributions to cutaneous melanoma progression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting survival for patients with mesothelioma: development of the PLACE prognostic model.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Prognostic risk assessment model for alternative splicing events and splicing factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and highly malignant thoracic tumor. Although alternative splicing (AS) is associated with tumor prognosis, the prognostic significance of AS in MPM is unknown.
methodsTranscriptomic data, clinical information, and splicing percentage values for MPM were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and TCGA SpliceSeq databases. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to establish a model affecting the prognosis of MPM. Survival and ROC analyses were used to test the effects of the prognostic model. LASSO/multivariate Cox analysis was used to construct the MPM prognostic splicing factor (SF) model. The SF-AS interaction network was analyzed using Spearman correlation and visualized using Cytoscape. The association between the MPM prognostic SF model and drug sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin was analyzed using pRRophetic.R.
resultsThe LASSO/multivariate Cox analysis identified 41 AS events and 2 SFs that were mostly associated with survival. Nine prognostic prediction models (i.e., seven types of AS model, total AS model, and SF model) were developed. An MPM prognostic SF-AS regulatory network was subsequently constructed with decreased drug sensitivity in the SF model high-risk group (p = 0.025).
conclusionThis study provides the first comprehensive analysis of the prognostic value of AS events and SFs in MPM. The SF-AS regulatory network established in this study and our drug sensitivity analysis using the SF model may provide novel targets for pharmacological studies of MPM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.