Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36031794›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Comparison of patient characteristics and long-term mortality between transferred and non-transferred COVID-19 patients in Dutch intensive care units: A national cohort study.

Safira A Wortel, Ferishta Bakhshi-Raiez, Fabian Termorshuizen, Dylan W de Lange, Dave A Dongelmans, Nicolette F de Keizer, Dutch COVID-19 Research Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Safira A WortelDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0840-132X
Ferishta Bakhshi-RaiezDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Fabian TermorshuizenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dylan W de LangeDepartment of Medical Informatics, National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Foundation, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dave A DongelmansQuality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nicolette F de KeizerDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dutch COVID-19 Research Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 patients were often transferred to other intensive care units (ICUs) to prevent that ICUs would reach their maximum capacity. However, transferring ICU patients is not free of risk. We aim to compare the characteristics and outcomes of transferred versus non-transferred COVID-19 ICU patients in the Netherlands.

methodsWe included adult COVID-19 patients admitted to Dutch ICUs between March 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021. We compared the patient characteristics and outcomes of non-transferred and transferred patients and used a Directed Acyclic Graph to identify potential confounders in the relationship between transfer and mortality. We used these confounders in a Cox regression model with left truncation at the day of transfer to analyze the effect of transfers on mortality during the 180 days after ICU admission.

resultsWe included 10,209 patients: 7395 non-transferred and 2814 (27.6%) transferred patients. In both groups, the median age was 64 years. Transferred patients were mostly ventilated at ICU admission (83.7% vs. 56.2%) and included a larger proportion of low-risk patients (70.3% vs. 66.5% with mortality risk <30%). After adjusting for age, APACHE IV mortality probability, BMI, mechanical ventilation, and vasoactive medication use, the hazard of mortality during the first 180 days was similar for transferred patients compared to non-transferred patients (HR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.91-1.08]).

conclusionsTransferred COVID-19 patients are more often mechanically ventilated and are less severely ill compared to non-transferred patients. Furthermore, transferring critically ill COVID-19 patients in the Netherlands is not associated with mortality during the first 180 days after ICU admission.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAPACHECohort StudiesCritical IllnessHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialCOVID-19intensive care unitintrahospital transfermortalityseverity of illness

Identifiers

PMID36031794
PMCPMC9539143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.