Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36031672›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2022

The impact of cognitive aids on resuscitation performance in in-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Francesco Corazza, Elena Fiorese, Marta Arpone, Giacomo Tardini, Anna Chiara Frigo, Adam Cheng, Liviana Da Dalt, Silvia Bressan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco CorazzaDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elena FioreseDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marta ArponeDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Giacomo TardiniDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Anna Chiara FrigoBiostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Adam ChengDepartments of Paediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Liviana Da DaltDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Silvia BressanDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy. silvia.bressan.1@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-5392

Funding

Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Italy BIRD203279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different cognitive aids have been recently developed to support the management of cardiac arrest, however, their effectiveness remains barely investigated. We aimed to assess whether clinicians using any cognitive aids compared to no or alternative cognitive aids for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) scenarios achieve improved resuscitation performance. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify studies comparing the management of adult/paediatric IHCA simulated scenarios by health professionals using different or no cognitive aids. Our primary outcomes were adherence to guideline recommendations (overall team performance) and time to critical resuscitation actions. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed. Of the 4.830 screened studies, 16 (14 adult, 2 paediatric) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses of eight eligible adult studies indicated that the use of electronic/paper-based cognitive aids, in comparison with no aid, was significantly associated with better overall resuscitation performance [standard mean difference (SMD) 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64; 1.69; I

Indexed as

AmiodaroneCardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestAdultChildHospitalsHumansThoraxAmiodaroneCognitive aidHeart arrestResuscitationSimulation trainingSupport tool

Identifiers

PMID36031672
PMCPMC9420676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.