Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36031609›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2022

Trends in utilization and costs of migraine medications, 2017-2020.

Jennifer L Nguyen, Kiraat Munshi, Samuel K Peasah, Elizabeth C S Swart, Monal Kohli, Rochelle Henderson, Chester B Good

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Costs and use of antimigraine drugs in Italy: a ten-year analysis of national data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer L NguyenCenters for High-Value Health Care and Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Health Plan, 600 Grant Street, 40th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA. Nguyenj12@upmc.edu.
Kiraat MunshiEvernorth Research Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Samuel K PeasahCenters for High-Value Health Care and Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Health Plan, 600 Grant Street, 40th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Elizabeth C S SwartCenters for High-Value Health Care and Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Health Plan, 600 Grant Street, 40th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Monal KohliEvernorth Research Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rochelle HendersonEvernorth Research Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Chester B GoodCenters for High-Value Health Care and Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Health Plan, 600 Grant Street, 40th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examines changes in utilization and costs trends associated with migraine medications.

backgroundMigraine attacks are a burden to many patients. There are many pharmacotherapy options available with newer migraine drug classes entering the market in the past decade. Little is known about the use, associated costs, and the impact of the newer agents.

methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study examined 2017-2020 administrative claims from a large national pharmacy benefits manager. Patients aged ≥ 18 years enrolled in commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, or health insurance exchange insurance plans who filled ≥ 2 prescription claims for triptans, ergotamines, isometheptenes, gepants, ditans, and CGRP mABs were included. A two-sample t-test was conducted to estimate whether differences in mean utilization and costs between 2017 and 2020 were statistically significant for migraine drug classes, except for CGRP mABs, which were estimated between 2018 and 2020.

resultsThe sample ranged from 161,369 (2017) to 240,330 (2020) patients. 84.5% (n = 203,110; 2020) of patients were women. The number of 30-day adjusted prescription fills for prophylaxis remained stable over the four-year period, except for CGRP mABs, which increased from 0.5% (n = 0.007; 2018) to 5.3% (n = 0.075; 2020). Antiepileptics, antidepressants and beta blockers were the most common prophylaxes, while triptans, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/non-narcotic analgesics and opioids were the most common treatments utilized. CGRP mABs were the most expensive, while utilization of triptans were the highest. CGRP mABs had the largest increase in utilization (177.5%) and costs (166.3%) PPPM in 2020 ($291.17) compared to 2018 ($109.35), the year they were first available (p < 0.001). Between 2018 and 2020, costs increased overall and for commercial and Medicare enrollees, but remained unchanged for Medicaid and HIX members.

conclusionOur study demonstrates a shift in migraine medication utilization from 2017-2020, where increased use of CGRP mABs had a significant contribution to increased costs. These increased pharmacy costs must be weighed against the improved tolerability of these agents likely resulting in other healthcare and indirect cost savings.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideMigraine DisordersAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMedicareRetrospective StudiesTryptaminesUnited StatesCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID36031609
PMCPMC9420279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.