Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36031558›Full record

GuidelineEuropean urology focus2022

Discordant Endorsement of Prostate Cancer Biomarkers Across Major Guidelines.

Manolis Pratsinis, Marc Dall'Era

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European urology focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manolis PratsinisDepartment of Urology, University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: mapratsinis@ucdavis.edu.
Marc Dall'EraDepartment of Urology, University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common solid cancer among men. Multiple blood-, urine-, and tissue-based biomarkers are currently commercially available and can improve the detection and risk stratification of prostate cancer. These biomarkers are still novel, however, and long-term data on their efficacy are still lacking. We compared recommendations on the use of biomarkers across major guidelines for different clinical scenarios. There is no consensus among the international guidelines regarding the optimal use of biomarkers for prostate cancer. As biomarker use in prostate cancer is still in its infancy, it remains to be seen whether there will be alignment of the guidelines with an increasing body of evidence generated . PATIENT SUMMARY: Various biomarkers beyond prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have recently been developed to improve detection and risk stratification of prostate cancer. We compared recommendations on the use of these biomarkers across major guidelines. There is currently little agreement between these guidelines on the optimal use of biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMalePelvisProstateBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific AntigenBiomarkerDecision-makingGenetic testingGuidelinesPrognostic factorsProstate cancerShared decision-makingStratification

Identifiers

PMID36031558
OpenAlexW4293124595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.