ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: an evaluation of obstetric management in German maternity units.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determining Urinary Bile Acid Profiles to Predict Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcome. Evidence for improvement by obstetric management is sparse. Common international guidelines recommend induction of labor before term, however, they differ in recommendations of monitoring the disease and time point of active management. So far, an official guideline for treatment and management of ICP in Germany does not exist. This study aims to compile common practice and policy in obstetric management of ICP in German maternity units. The objective is to gather obstetricians' opinion on management of ICP, and to estimate the need for standardization of current practice in Germany on the background of existing evidence.
methodsA questionnaire focusing on indications for interventions was developed including fourteen multiple-choice questions comprising the areas of diagnostic criteria, laboratory testing, fetal monitoring, treatment, and delivery timing. The survey was sent to 699 maternity clinics and was distributed to participants of the annual congress hosted by the German society of perinatal medicine (DGPM). Collected data were summarized and evaluated in relation to available evidence and existing guidelines. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used.
results334 completed questionnaires returned corresponding to a response rate of 48.1%. Coinciding with existing international guidelines, 48.8% of the participants acknowledge bile acid concentrations above 10 µmol/L to be indicative of ICP. 85.0% of obstetricians recommend antenatal testing with cardiotocography, exceeding common standards of maternity policy guidelines; 50.3% execute active management in ICP-affected pregnancies as they generally recommend a delivery between 37 + 0 and 38 + 6 weeks of gestation. Although recent studies evinced a risk of stillbirth in ICP-affected pregnancies not until a bile acid concentration of > 100 µmol/L, 22.2% of the respondents recommend delivery before 37 + 0 weeks of gestation due to raised bile acids of 40-99 µmol/L.
conclusionsOpinions on the management of ICP in German maternity units differ widely and partly deviate by large from international standards. Reasons for this may be the lack of a national guideline and the low awareness due to the rarity of the disease on the one hand and the very slow dynamics in evidence generation and thus the uncertainty about the actual risks and optimal management on the other. The present data highlight the need for further research and clinical guidelines to standardize and optimize treatment based on the best available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.