ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2022
Levodopa responsiveness in Parkinson's disease: harnessing real-life experience with machine-learning analysis.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic, Prognostic Value, and Pathological Associations of Levodopa Responsiveness in Parkinson's Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Characteristics of responders to interventions for Parkinson disease: a scoping systematic review.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Responsiveness to levodopa varies greatly among patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The factors that affect it are ill defined. The aim of the study was to identify factors predictive of long-term response to levodopa. The medical records of 296 patients with PD (mean age of onset, 62.2 ± 9.7 years) were screened for demographics, previous treatments, and clinical phenotypes. All patients were assessed with the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III before and 3 months after levodopa initiation. Regression and machine-learning analyses were used to determine factors that are associated with levodopa responsiveness and might identify patients who will benefit from treatment. The UPDRS-III score improved by ≥ 30% (good response) in 128 patients (43%). On regression analysis, female gender, young age at onset, and early use of dopamine agonists predicted a good response. Time to initiation of levodopa treatment had no effect on responsiveness except in patients older than 72 years, who were less responsive. Machine-learning analysis validated these factors and added several others: symptoms of rigidity and bradykinesia, disease onset in the legs and on the left side, and fewer white vascular ischemic changes, comorbidities, and pre-non-motor symptoms. The main determinants of variations in levodopa responsiveness are gender, age, and clinical phenotype. Early use of dopamine agonists does not hamper levodopa responsiveness. In addition to validating the regression analysis results, machine-learning methods helped to determine the specific clinical phenotype of patients who may benefit from levodopa in terms of comorbidities and pre-motor and non-motor symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.