Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36030310›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2022

Religion, Islam, and Compliance with COVID-19 Best Practices.

Rana Dajani, Marilie Coetsee, Amal Al-Tabba, Maysa Al-Hussaini

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rana DajaniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Marilie CoetseeJepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA. mcoetsee@richmond.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-0816
Amal Al-TabbaIndependent Researcher, Amman, Jordan.
Maysa Al-HussainiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many have implemented best practices intended to help stem the spread of COVID-19, there are also a substantial number of citizens, both domestically and abroad, who have resisted these practices. We argue that public health authorities, as well as scientific researchers and funders, should help address this resistance by putting greater effort into ascertaining how existing religious practices and beliefs align with COVID-19 guidelines. In particular, we contend that Euro-American scholars-who have often tended to implicitly favor secular and Christian worldviews-should put added focus on how Islamic commitments may (or may not) support COVID-19 best practices, including practices that extend beyond the domain of support for mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19IslamChristianityHumansReligionCOVID-19EthicsIslamLow and middle income countriesPublic healthReligionScientistsSecularism

Identifiers

PMID36030310
PMCPMC9419643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.