Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36030227›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2022

Comparing outcomes of ILD patients managed in specialised versus non-specialised centres.

Pavo Marijic, Larissa Schwarzkopf, Werner Maier, Franziska Trudzinski, Michael Kreuter, Lars Schwettmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifying outcome domains to establish a core outcome set for progressive pulmonary fibrosis: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavo MarijicInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Centre for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Larissa SchwarzkopfInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Centre for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Werner MaierInstitute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Centre for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Franziska TrudzinskiCentre for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstr. 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael Kreuter *Centre for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstr. 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. kreuter@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-2159
Lars Schwettmann *Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Centre for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly appropriate diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is crucial to slow disease progression and improve survival. Yet it is unknown whether initial management in an expert centre is associated with improved outcomes. Therefore, we assessed mortality, hospitalisations and health care costs of ILD patients initially diagnosed and managed in specialised ILD centres versus non-specialised centres and explored differences in pharmaceutical treatment patterns.

methodsAn epidemiological claims data analysis was performed, including patients with different ILD subtypes in Germany between 2013 and 2018. Classification of specialised centres was based on the number of ILD patients managed and procedures performed, as defined by the European Network on Rare Lung Diseases. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for covariates. Mortality and hospitalisations were examined via weighted Cox models, cost differences by weighted gamma regression models and differences in treatment patterns with weighted logistic regressions.

resultsWe compared 2022 patients managed in seven specialised ILD centres with 28,771 patients managed in 1156 non-specialised centres. Specialised ILD centre management was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.78; 0.96), lower all-cause hospitalisation (HR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.87; 0.98) and higher respiratory-related costs (€669, 95% CI €219; €1156). Although risk of respiratory-related hospitalisations (HR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.92; 1.10) and overall costs (€- 872, 95% CI €- 75; €1817) did not differ significantly, differences in treatment patterns were observed.

conclusionInitial management in specialised ILD centres is associated with improved mortality and lower all-cause hospitalisations, potentially due to more differentiated diagnostic approaches linked with more appropriate ILD subtype-adjusted therapy.

Indexed as

Lung Diseases, InterstitialHealth Care CostsHumansInsurance Claim ReviewLungRetrospective StudiesAdministrative dataExpert hospitalsHealth care costsStatutory health insuranceSurvivalTertiary care centre

Identifiers

PMID36030227
PMCPMC9420269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.