Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36030204›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Organisational structures and processes for health and well-being: insights from work integration social enterprise.

Andrew Joyce, Batool Moussa, Aurora Elmes, Perri Campbell, Roksolana Suchowerska, Fiona Buick, Jo Barraket, Gemma Carey

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Workplace Structures and Culture That Support the Wellbeing of People with an Intellectual Disability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Promoting the Integration of Elderly Healthcare and Elderly Nursing: Evidence from the Chinese Government.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew JoyceCentre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia. ajoyce@swin.edu.au.
Batool MoussaCentre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Aurora ElmesCentre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Perri CampbellCentre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Roksolana SuchowerskaCentre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Mail H25, Cnr John and Wakefield Streets, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Fiona BuickSchool of Business, University of New South Wales, Northcott Drive, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Jo BarraketMelbourne Social Equity Institute, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Gemma CareyCentre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, 704, Level 7, Science Engineering Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research on employee well-being for those who have experienced social and economic disadvantage and those with previous or existing mental health conditions has focused mainly on programmatic interventions. The purpose of this research was to examine how organisational structures and processes (such as policies and culture) influence well-being of employees from these types of backgrounds.

methodsA case study ethnographic approach which included in-depth qualitative analysis of 93 semi-structured interviews of employees, staff, and managers, together with participant observation of four social enterprises employing young people.

resultsThe data revealed that young people were provided a combination of training, varied work tasks, psychosocial support, and encouragement to cultivate relationships among peers and management staff. This was enabled through the following elements: structure and space; funding, finance and industry orientation; organisational culture; policy and process; and fostering local service networks.. The findings further illustrate how organisational structures at these workplaces promoted an inclusive workplace environment in which participants self-reported a decrease in anxiety and depression, increased self-esteem, increased self-confidence and increased physical activity.

conclusionsReplicating these types of organisational structures, processes, and culture requires consideration of complex systems perspectives on implementation fidelity which has implications for policy, practice and future research.

Indexed as

Organizational CultureWorkplaceAdolescentEmploymentHumansIndustryPsychosocial Support SystemsEconomic and social inclusionWorkplace health and well-beingYoung people

Identifiers

PMID36030204
PMCPMC9419331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.