Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36030123›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Evaluation of BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness in Malaysia: test negative case-control study.

Audrey Huili Lim, Norazida Ab Rahman, Su Miin Ong, Jubaida Paraja, Rahmah Rashid, Ishvinder Singh Parmar, Siti Nadiah Dahlan, Zhi Shan Sujata Tan, Ismuni Bohari, Kalaiarasu M Peariasamy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Audrey Huili LimInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia. Electronic address: audreylim.moh@gmail.com.
Norazida Ab RahmanInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Su Miin OngInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Jubaida ParajaLabuan Hospital, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Rahmah RashidLabuan State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Ishvinder Singh ParmarLabuan Hospital, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Siti Nadiah DahlanLabuan State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Zhi Shan Sujata TanLabuan State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Ismuni BohariLabuan State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Kalaiarasu M PeariasamyInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Sheamini SivasampuInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a notable lack of vaccine effectiveness studies using test-negative case-controlled approach in low- and middle-income countries which have different logistic, demographic and socio-economic conditions from high-income countries. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine against COVID-19 infection over time, intensive care unit admission, severe or critical disease and death due to COVID-19. This study was conducted in the resident population of Labuan aged ≥18 years who had been tested for SARS-CoV-2 by Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction between 1 March 2021 and 31 October 2021. We used a test-negative case-control design where 2644 pairs of cases and controls were matched by age, sex, testing date, nationality and testing reason. Analysis was stratified by age group to estimate age effect (<60 years and ≥60 years). Of 22217 individuals tested by Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, 5100 were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and aged 18 years and above. Overall vaccine effectiveness ≥ 14 days after the second dose was 65.2% (95% CI: 59.8-69.9%) against COVID-19 infection, 92.5% (95% CI: 72.3-98.8%) against intensive care unit admission, and 96.5% (95% CI: 82.3-99.8%) against COVID-19 deaths. Among infected individuals, vaccine effectiveness was 79.2% (95% CI: 42.3-94.1%) in preventing severe or critical disease due to COVID-19. Vaccine effectiveness for ≥60 years was 72.3% (95% CI: 53.4-83.9%) in fully vaccinated individuals, higher than 64.8% (95% CI: 49.3-59.1%) for those <60 years. Two doses of BNT162b2 were highly effective against COVID-19 infection, severe or critical disease, intensive care unit admission and death due to COVID-19. This study addresses a gap in literature on BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness in low- and middle-income populations and demonstrates the feasibility of such a study design in a resource limited setting while supporting evidence of waning immunity.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMalaysiaSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesBNT162b2Case controlCOVID-19LMICTest-negativeVaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36030123
PMCPMC9399819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.