Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36029775›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2022

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children to contacts in schools and households: a prospective cohort and environmental sampling study in London.

Rebecca Cordery, Lucy Reeves, Jie Zhou, Aileen Rowan, Patricia Watber, Carolina Rosadas, Michael Crone, Marko Storch, Paul Freemont, Lucy Mosscrop and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca CorderyLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Lucy ReevesDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Aileen RowanDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Patricia WatberDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Carolina RosadasDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael CroneDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Marko StorchDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul FreemontDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lucy MosscropDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alice CowleyLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Gina ZelentLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Kate BissetLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Holly Le BlondLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Sadie RegmiLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Christian BuckinghamDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ramlah JunaideenDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nadia AbdullaDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joseph EliahooStatistical Advisory Service, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Miranda MindlinLondon Health Protection Teams, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Theresa LamagniCOVID-19 EpiCell, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Wendy BarclayDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Graham P TaylorDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Shiranee SriskandanDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK; The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, London, UK. Electronic address: s.sriskandan@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBRoyal Statistical Society · GB

Funding

Department of Health COV0322Medical Research Council MR/V028413/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children in schools is of crucial importance to inform public health action. We assessed frequency of acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 by contacts of pupils with COVID-19 in schools and households, and quantified SARS-CoV-2 shedding into air and onto fomites in both settings.

methodsWe did a prospective cohort and environmental sampling study in London, UK in eight schools. Schools reporting new cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection to local health protection teams were invited to take part if a child index case had been attending school in the 48 h before a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. At the time of the study, PCR testing was available to symptomatic individuals only. Children aged 2-14 years (extended to <18 years in November, 2020) with a new nose or throat swab SARS-CoV-2 positive PCR from an accredited laboratory were included. Incidents involving exposure to at least one index pupil with COVID-19 were identified (the prevailing variants were original, α, and δ). Weekly PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 was done on immediate classroom contacts (the so-called bubble), non-bubble school contacts, and household contacts of index pupils. Testing was supported by genome sequencing and on-surface and air samples from school and home environments.

findingsBetween October, 2020, and July, 2021 from the eight schools included, secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in 28 bubble contacts, representing ten bubble classes (participation rate 8·8% [IQR 4·6-15·3]). Across eight non-bubble classes, 3 (2%) of 62 pupils tested positive, but these were unrelated to the original index case (participation rate 22·5% [9·7-32·3]). All three were asymptomatic and tested positive in one setting on the same day. In contrast, secondary transmission to previously negative household contacts from infected index pupils was found in six (17%) of 35 household contacts rising to 13 (28%) of 47 household contacts when considering all potential infections in household contacts. Environmental contamination with SARS-CoV-2 was rare in schools: fomite SARS-CoV-2 was identified in four (2%) of 189 samples in bubble classrooms, two (2%) of 127 samples in non-bubble classrooms, and five (4%) of 130 samples in washrooms. This contrasted with fomites in households, where SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 60 (24%) of 248 bedroom samples, 66 (27%) of 241 communal room samples, and 21 (11%) 188 bathroom samples. Air sampling identified SARS-CoV-2 RNA in just one (2%) of 68 of school air samples, compared with 21 (25%) of 85 air samples taken in homes.

interpretationThere was no evidence of large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools with precautions in place. Low levels of environmental contamination in schools are consistent with low transmission frequency and suggest adequate cleaning and ventilation in schools during the period of study. The high frequency of secondary transmission in households associated with evident viral shedding throughout the home suggests a need to improve advice to households with infection in children to prevent onward community spread. The data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 transmission from children in any setting is very likely to occur when precautions are reduced.

fundingUK Research and Innovation and UK Department of Health and Social Care, National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ChildHumansLondonProspective StudiesRNA, ViralSampling StudiesSchoolsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID36029775
PMCPMC9401977
OpenAlexW4293201464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.