ArticleJournal of communication disorders
Moment-to-Moment Processing of Complex Sentences by Adults with and without Developmental Language Disorder.
Article in Journal of communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Neural Cost of Language Processing: Broader Network Recruitment in Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introduction. Limited evidence suggests that adults with developmental language disorder (DLD) take different information into account as they process sentences as compared to peers with typical language. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how two factors affect sentence processing in adults with DLD: online storage costs and lexical expectations created by nouns.
methods. Forty-three adults, 21 with DLD, listened to complex sentences presented word-by-word, and their listening times were recorded. The sentences included either object relative clauses or sentential complements which differed in online storage demands. The main clause subject nouns differed in co-occurrence frequency with "that" in sentences produced by typical adults. Participants completed a running span task to assess verbal working memory capacity.
results. Mixed effects models found differences by sentence region. Participants with DLD processed embedded clause verbs faster than participants with typical language, and poorer language ability was associated with faster processing of conjunctions "that" and "which." Participants with greater verbal working memory capacity or typical language were affected by noun co-occurrence frequencies but those with lower working memory or DLD were not.
conclusions. The results align with prior findings that verbal working memory capacity influences what information affects moment-to-moment sentence processing. Those with greater capacity appeared to be more affected by temporary ambiguity. As compared to adults with typical language, processing times of adults with DLD were less sensitive to information on words that frequently co-occur with nouns. This aligns with prior findings suggesting that adults with DLD are less sensitive to the frequency of the structures and arguments that co-occur with verbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.