ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2022
Biomechanics of nectar feeding explain flower orientation in plants pollinated by long-proboscid flies.
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pollination by long-proboscid horseflies and its implications for reproductive isolation among coflowering Satyrium orchids in South Africa.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Evidence for moth pollination in a rhinomyiophilous Erica species from the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa.PhytoKeys · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The function of flower orientation is much debated, with adaptation to pollinator mouthparts being a particularly compelling explanation, but also one that has lacked empirical support from broad-scale comparative studies. The two families of long-proboscid fly pollinators show similar hovering behaviour while feeding on nectar but differ in the biomechanics of their proboscides which can be up to 80 mm in length: Tabanidae have a fixed forward-pointing proboscis while Nemestrinidae can swivel their proboscis downwards. We predicted that this difference has implications for the evolution of flower orientation. We established the flower angles of 156 South African plant species specialised for pollination by long-proboscid flies. Using a phylogenetically corrected analysis, we found that flowers pollinated by Tabanidae tend to be horizontally orientated, while those pollinated by Nemestrinidae tend to be more variable in orientation and more often vertically orientated. These results confirm the importance of pollinator biomechanics for the evolution of floral traits and highlight a potential mechanism of reproductive isolation between sympatric plant species pollinated by different long-proboscid fly families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36029364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.