Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36029364›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2022

Biomechanics of nectar feeding explain flower orientation in plants pollinated by long-proboscid flies.

Sam McCarren, Jeremy J Midgley, Steven D Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sam McCarrenUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa. z.mccarren@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3861-0811
Jeremy J MidgleyUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-2301
Steven D JohnsonUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5114-5862

Funding

National Research Foundation MND190724458797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of flower orientation is much debated, with adaptation to pollinator mouthparts being a particularly compelling explanation, but also one that has lacked empirical support from broad-scale comparative studies. The two families of long-proboscid fly pollinators show similar hovering behaviour while feeding on nectar but differ in the biomechanics of their proboscides which can be up to 80 mm in length: Tabanidae have a fixed forward-pointing proboscis while Nemestrinidae can swivel their proboscis downwards. We predicted that this difference has implications for the evolution of flower orientation. We established the flower angles of 156 South African plant species specialised for pollination by long-proboscid flies. Using a phylogenetically corrected analysis, we found that flowers pollinated by Tabanidae tend to be horizontally orientated, while those pollinated by Nemestrinidae tend to be more variable in orientation and more often vertically orientated. These results confirm the importance of pollinator biomechanics for the evolution of floral traits and highlight a potential mechanism of reproductive isolation between sympatric plant species pollinated by different long-proboscid fly families.

Indexed as

ButterfliesDipteraAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFlowersPlant NectarPlantsPollinationPlant NectarAdaptationCape Floristic RegionNemestrinidaeTabanidae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.