Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36029360›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Sacroiliac innervation.

Hanno Steinke, Toshiyuki Saito, Janne Kuehner, Uta Reibetanz, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde, Masahiro Itoh, Anna Voelker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanno SteinkeDepartment of Anatomy, University Leipzig, Liebigstr. 13, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. steinke@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7117-9330
Toshiyuki SaitoDepartment of Anatomy, Tokyo Medical University, 6-1-1 Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8402, Japan.
Janne KuehnerDepartment of Anatomy, University Leipzig, Liebigstr. 13, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Uta ReibetanzDepartment of Biophysics, University Leipzig, Härtelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph-Eckhard HeydeDepartment of Orthopeadics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Masahiro ItohDepartment of Anatomy, Tokyo Medical University, 6-1-1 Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8402, Japan.
Anna VoelkerDepartment of Orthopeadics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DETokyo Medical University · JPUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DELeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the innervation pattern of the sacroiliac region, especially with regard to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). Dorsal SIJ innervation was analyzed and described. Our main hypothesis was that nerves reach the SIJ dorsally, passing ligamental compartments, as this would explain dorsal SIJ pain.

methodsTo examine sacroiliac innervation, we followed the nerves in over 50 specimens over several years. Plastinated slices were evaluated, nerves in the region were stained histologically, and the data were summarized as 3D models.

resultsThe Rami communicans and posterior branches of the spinal nerves and their branches that form a dorsal sacral plexus and communicating branches, together with corresponding vessels, were observed to form neurovascular bundles embedded by tiny fatty connectives in gaps and tunnels. Branches of L5-S1 pass the inner sacroiliac ligaments (the interosseous sacroiliac ligament and axial interosseous ligament). The outer sacroiliac ligaments (posterior sacroiliac ligaments, long posterior sacroiliac ligament, sacrotuberal ligament, thoracolumbar fascia) are passed by the S1-S4 branches. However, although the paths of these nerves are in the direction of the SIJ, they do not reach it. It is possible that impingement of the neurovascular bundles may result in pain. Moreover, the gaps and tunnels connect to the open dorsal SIJ.

conclusionOur findings suggest that Bogduk's term "sacroiliac pain" correlates to "sacroiliac innervation", which consists of "inner-" and "outer sacroiliac ligament innervation", and to ventral "SIJ pain". The watery gaps and tunnels observed could play a significant role in innervation and thus in the origins of SIJ pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Indexed as

Lumbosacral PlexusSacroiliac JointArthralgiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLigaments, ArticularPainCollagenEntrapmentImpingementLigament painSacroiliac jointSacroiliac pain

Identifiers

PMID36029360
OpenAlexW4293364291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.