Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36029241›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

Cancer Hazard Evaluations for Contemporary Needs: Highlights From New National Toxicology Program Evaluations and Methodological Advancements.

Ruth M Lunn, Suril S Mehta, Gloria D Jahnke, Amy Wang, Mary S Wolfe, Brian R Berridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Metal-Based Nanoparticles: A Prospective Strategy forInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth M LunnDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9605-7137
Suril S MehtaDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Gloria D JahnkeDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Amy WangDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Mary S WolfeDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Brian R BerridgeDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

Research Infrastructure and Operations Supporting the National Toxicology Program (NTP)ZICES103377 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2022 to 2025
$17.7M
Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZ01ES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1999 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES044005NIEHS NIH HHS Z01 ES044005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Toxicology Program strives to raise awareness of cancer hazards in our environment. Identifying cancer hazards is key to primary prevention, informing public health decision making, and decreasing the global cancer burden. In December 2021, the US congressionally mandated 15th Report on Carcinogens was released, adding 8 new substances to the cumulative report. Chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori is listed as "known to be a human carcinogen." Antimony trioxide and 6 haloacetic acids found as water disinfection by-products-dichloroacetic acid, dibromoacetic acid, bromochloroacetic acid, tribromoacetic acid, bromodichloroacetic acid, chlorodibromoacetic acid-are listed as "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen." A new dashboard provides interactive visualization and interrogation of the 256 listed substances, their uses, and associated cancers. Also, the National Toxicology Program recently published a Cancer Hazard Assessment Report on exposure scenarios associated with circadian disruption, concluding that persistent night shift work can cause breast cancer and certain lighting conditions may cause cancer. As highlighted in these reports and evaluations, we are evolving our approaches to meet contemporary challenges. These approaches include focusing on real-world exposures and advancing our methods to address challenges in cancer hazard assessments (eg, developing more structured approaches to evaluate mechanistic data and incorporating read-across approaches to assess chemicals lacking adequate human or animal cancer data). To promote public health, we provide information on environmental health disparities and disease prevention. Building on these efforts, we aim to continue our contributions to the war on cancer, declared 50 years ago.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsCarcinogensDichloroacetic AcidHumansProgram EvaluationCarcinogensDichloroacetic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36029241
PMCPMC9949597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.