Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36029205›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2022

Atypical glandular cells and development of cervical cancer: Population-based cohort study.

Ingrid Norman, Emel Yilmaz, Anders Hjerpe, Maria Hortlund, Klara Miriam Elfström, Joakim Dillner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05709730 (Follow-up of Cell Changes in the Cervix), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05709730 active not recruitingnot on this map

Follow-up of Cell Changes in the Cervix

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2016 to 2029Enrolled885ConditionsCancer of CervixArmsHPV genotyping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid NormanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emel YilmazDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Center for Cervical Cancer Prevention, Medical Diagnostics Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders HjerpeDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Center for Cervical Cancer Prevention, Medical Diagnostics Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria HortlundDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Klara Miriam ElfströmDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joakim DillnerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8588-6506
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of cervical screening on cervical adenocarcinoma has been variable, possibly because the risk associated with the precursor atypical glandular cells (AGC) is not well known. A cohort of all 885 women in the capital region of Sweden with AGC, a concomitant human papillomavirus (HPV) analysis, and a histopathology was followed until 2019. Cumulative incidence proportions of cervical intraepithelial lesion grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) by HPV type was determined by 1-Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios (HR) for CIN3+ or for invasive cancer were estimated with Cox regression. After 2 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence proportions of CIN3+ were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74-86%), 58% (95% CI: 50-60%) and 10% (95% CI: 5-18%) among HPV16/18 positive, "other HPV" positive and HPV-negative women, respectively. Among the 300 women with HPV16/18 positive AGC, 217 developed CIN3+ of which 35 were invasive cervical cancer. The 2-year cumulative invasive cancer risk for HPV16/18 positive AGC was 17% (95% CI: 12-24%). Primary HPV-screening had a similar yield of CIN3+ as cytology screening, albeit HPV-negative AGC is by design not detected by HPV screening. Among 241 women with HPV-negative AGC, 11 developed CIN3+ mostly after clinically indicated samples. We found no significant risk differences depending on age or sampling indication. The low CIN3+ risk after HPV-negative AGC implies safety of primary HPV screening. The high risk of invasive cervical cancer after HPV16/18 positive AGC implies that management of this finding is a priority in cervical screening.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansPapillomaviridaeRisk AssessmentVaginal Smearsatypical glandular cellscervical intraepithelialHPV genotyping

Identifiers

PMID36029205
PMCPMC9804756
OpenAlexW4291222815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.