Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36029034›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Scandinavica2022

Thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke-Does age matter?

Mehdi K Rezai, Ingvild Dalen, Rajiv Advani, Lars Fjetland, Kathinka D Kurz, Knut Olav Sandve, Martin W Kurz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehdi K RezaiDepartment of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-6818
Ingvild DalenDepartment of Research, Section of Biostatistics, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-3211
Rajiv AdvaniNeuroscience Research Group, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-0574
Lars FjetlandStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory (SMIL), Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-2334
Kathinka D KurzStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory (SMIL), Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-041X
Knut Olav SandveStavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory (SMIL), Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Martin W KurzDepartment of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8853-4450
Stavanger University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndovascular treatment (EVT) is the gold standard treatment for emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO). The benefit of EVT for emergent LVO in elderly patients (>80 years old) is still debated as they have been under-represented in randomized controlled trials. Elderly patients with an emergent LVO are a growing population warranting further study. MATERIALS &

methodsWe included 225 consecutive patients treated with EVT for LVO either in the anterior or posterior circulation. The clinical outcome was assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Long-term functional outcome was assessed using 90-day modified ranking scale (mRS).

resultsNeurological improvement: A five-year higher age predicted a 0.43 higher mean NIHSS score after EVT (p = .027). After adjusting for confounders (influencing variables), the association between age and post-interventional NIHSS was reduced and non-significant (p = .17). At discharge, a five-year higher age predicted a 0.74 higher mean NIHSS (p = .003). After adjusting for confounders this association was reduced and non-significant (p = .06). Long-term functional outcome: A five-year higher age predicted a 0.20 higher mRS at three months (p < .001). When adjusting for confounders this number was reduced to 0.16, yet still highly significant (p < .001).

conclusionsAge seems to have a minor role in predicting neurological improvement after EVT but has an impact on long-term functional outcome. The decision to perform or withhold EVT should therefore not solely be based on age.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeAged, 80 and overHumansRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment Outcomeacute treatmentelderlyendovascular treatmentgeneral interventional radiologistslarge vessel occlusionstrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID36029034
PMCPMC9804277
OpenAlexW4293367146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.