Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36028866›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Annual distributions of insecticide-treated nets to schoolchildren and other key populations to maintain higher ITN access than with mass campaigns: a modelling study for mainland Tanzania.

Hannah Koenker, Matt Worges, Benjamin Kamala, Peter Gitanya, Frank Chacky, Samwel Lazaro, Charles Dismas Mwalimu, Sijenunu Aaron, Deodatus Mwingizi, David Dadi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Assessing the utility of pregnant women as a sentinel surveillance population for malaria in Geita, Tanzania, 2019 - 2021.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hannah KoenkerUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Tropical Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. hannah@trophealth.com.
Matt WorgesUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Tropical Health, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Benjamin KamalaUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health Center for Communication Programmes, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Peter GitanyaNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Frank ChackyNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Samwel LazaroNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Charles Dismas MwalimuNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Sijenunu AaronNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Deodatus MwingiziUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health Center for Communication Programmes, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
David DadiUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health Center for Communication Programmes, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ato SelbyUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health Center for Communication Programmes, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Naomi SerbantezUS President's Malaria Initiative, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Lulu MsangiUS President's Malaria Initiative, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Dana LollUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joshua YukichUSAID Tanzania Vector Control Activity, Tropical Health, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development 72062120C00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2013, the National Malaria Control Programme in mainland Tanzania has deployed annual distributions of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) through primary schools to maintain ITN access and use. This School Net Programme (SNP) is slated to be used throughout mainland Tanzania by 2023. This modelling study projects ITN access under different ITN distribution strategies and quantification approaches.

methodsA stock and flow model with a Tanzania-specific ITN decay rate was used to calculate annual net crops for four different ITN distribution strategies, varying quantification approaches within each strategy. Annual nets-per-capita (NPC) was derived from net crop and a standardized population projection. Nonparametric conditional quartile functions for the proportion of the population with access to an ITN (ITN access) as a function of NPC were used to predict ITN access and its variability. The number of ITNs required under the varying quantification approaches for the period 2022-2030 was calculated.

resultsAnnual SNP quantified using a "population times 15%" approach maintained ITN access between 80 and 90%, when combined with reproductive and child health (RCH) ITN distribution, requiring 133.2 million ITNs. The same strategy quantified with "population times 22%" maintained ITN access at or above 90%, requiring 175.5 million ITNs. Under 5-year mass campaigns with RCH distribution for pregnant women and infants, ITN access reached 90% post-campaign and fell to 27-35% in the 4th year post-campaign, requiring 120.5 million ITNs over 8 years. 3-yearly mass campaigns with RCH reached 100% ITN access post-campaign and fell to 70% in the 3rd year post-campaign, requiring 154.4 million ITNs.

conclusionGiven an ITN retention time in Tanzania of 2.15 years, the model predicts that mass campaigns conducted every 3 years in mainland Tanzania will not maintain ITN access at target levels of 80%, even with strong RCH channels. Mainland Tanzania can however expect to maintain ITN access at 80% or above by quantifying SNP using "population × 15%", in addition to RCH ITN delivery. This strategy requires 14% fewer ITNs than a 3-year campaign strategy while providing more consistent ITN coverage. Meeting the targets of 80% ITN use would require maintaining 90% ITN access, achievable using a "population times 22%" quantification approach for SNP.

Indexed as

InsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaChildFemaleHumansInfantMosquito ControlPregnancySchoolsTanzaniaInsecticidesBed netDistributionInsecticide-treated netITNMalaria controlQuantificationSchool childrenTanzaniaVector control

Identifiers

PMID36028866
PMCPMC9417077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.