Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36028745›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Near-digital amplification in paper improves sensitivity and speed in biplexed reactions.

Kamal G Shah, Sujatha Kumar, Paul Yager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamal G ShahDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sujatha KumarDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. sujathar@uw.edu.
Paul YagerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

HIVAcute: rapid sample-to-result self-testing for HIV RNAR33AI147354 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YAGER, PAUL · 2022 to 2023
$1.5M
HIVAcute: rapid sample-to-result self-testing for HIV RNAR61AI147354 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YAGER, PAUL · 2019 to 2021
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI147354NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI147354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simplest point-of-care assays are usually paper and plastic devices that detect proteins or nucleic acids at low cost and minimal user steps, albeit with poor limits of detection. Digital assays improve limits of detection and analyte quantification by splitting a sample across many wells (or droplets), preventing diffusion, and performing analyte amplification and detection in multiple small wells. However, truly digital nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) require costly consumable cartridges that are precisely manufactured, aligned, and operated to enable low detection limits. In this study, we demonstrate how to implement near-digital NAATs in low-cost porous media while approaching the low limits of detection of digital assays. The near-digital NAAT was enabled by a paper membrane containing lyophilized amplification reagents that automatically, passively meters and distributes a sample over a wide area. Performing a NAAT in the paper membrane while allowing diffusion captures many of the benefits of digital NAATs if the pad is imaged at a high spatial resolution during amplification. We show that the near-digital NAAT is compatible with a low-cost paper and plastic disposable cartridge coupled to a 2-layer rigid printed circuit board heater (the MD NAAT platform). We also demonstrate compatibility with biplexing and imaging with mobile phones with different camera sensors. We show that the near-digital NAAT increased signal-to-noise ratios by ~ 10×, improved limits of detection from above 10

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNucleic AcidsDNANucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPlasticsDNANucleic AcidsPlastics

Identifiers

PMID36028745
PMCPMC9418329
OpenAlexW4293428243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.