Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36028568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Using of geographic information systems (GIS) to determine the suitable site for collecting agricultural residues.

El-Sayed G Khater, Samir A Ali, Mohamed T Afify, Magdy A Bayomy, Rasha S Abbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

El-Sayed G KhaterAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, P.O. Box 13736, Banha, Egypt. alsayed.khater@fagr.bu.edu.eg.
Samir A AliAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, P.O. Box 13736, Banha, Egypt.
Mohamed T AfifyAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, P.O. Box 13736, Banha, Egypt.
Magdy A BayomyInstitute of Agricultural Engineering Research, Agriculture Research Center, Doki, Giza, Egypt.
Rasha S AbbasInstitute of Agricultural Engineering Research, Agriculture Research Center, Doki, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to use the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) techniques to determine the optimum site to collect the residues in order to reduce cost and increase the benefits. To achieve these three scenarios were studied to reach the best collection sites for recycling rice straw in Sinbilawin center. The results indicate that the first scenario: The result was forty (40) collection sites in this status the cost of transfer will be very high because the collecting starts from inside village to the 40 sites and transfer to main sites to recycle operation. The second scenario: The total lengths of roads are not much then the cost of transfer is low and save time and efforts. The third scenario: The result was five collecting sites. It was shortest length and lowest cost. Transportation costs in the first scenario were difficult to calculate because of the difficulty to access a network of documented roads from satellite maps to use it with the GIS program. The total internal transport costs were 987,308.86 and 826,966.43 L.E (Egyptian pound, $ = 19.15 L.E) for second and third scenarios, respectively. The average transport costs per ton were 17 and 14 L.E/ton for the second and third scenarios, respectively. Also, the total lengths of roads were 817.62 and 615.65 km for the second and third scenarios, respectively.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsTransportationAgricultureEgyptRecycling

Identifiers

PMID36028568
PMCPMC9418255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.