ArticleScientific reports2022
Phenome of coeliac disease vs. inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Gluten in Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Review.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Malignancies in Patients with Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Challenges and Molecular Advances.Genes · 2023Review
- Article
- User testing to modify the MyHealthyGut digital health application for inflammatory bowel disease.Digital healthArticle
- Editorial: New Perspectives on Hepatic Steatosis.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Coeliac disease (CeD) is characterized by gliadin-induced intestinal inflammation appearing in genetically susceptible individuals, such as HLA-DQ2.5 carriers. CeD, as well as other chronic intestinal disorders, such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the causes are unknown. We systematically analysed CeD-associated diagnoses and compared them to conditions enriched in subjects with CD/UC as well as in HLA-DQ2.5 carriers without CeD. We compared the overall and cause-specific mortality and morbidity of 3,001 patients with CeD, 2,020 with CD, 4,399 with UC and 492,200 controls in the community-based UK Biobank. Disease-specific phenotypes were assessed with the multivariable Phenome Wide Association Study (PheWAS) method. Associations were adjusted for age, sex and body mass index. All disease groups displayed higher overall mortality than controls (CD: aHR = 1.91[1.70-2.17]; UC: aHR = 1.32 [1.20-1.46]; CeD: aHR = 1.38 [1.22-1.55]). Cardiovascular and cancer-related deaths were responsible for the majority of fatalities. PheWAS analysis revealed 166 Phecodes overrepresented in all three disorders, whereas only ~ 20% of enriched Phecodes were disease specific. Seven of the 58 identified CeD-specific Phecodes were enriched in individuals homozygous for HLA-DQ2.5 without diagnosed CeD. Four out of these seven Phecodes and eight out of 19 HLA-DQ2.5 specific Phecodes were more common in homozygous HLA-DQ2.5 subjects with vs. without CeD, highlighting the interplay between genetics and diagnosis-related factors. Our study illustrates that the morbidity and mortality in CeD share similarities with CD/UC, while the CeD-restricted conditions might be driven by both inherited and acquired factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.