Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36028514›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.

Maxime Amoyel, Arthur Belle, Marion Dhooge, Einas Abou Ali, Anna Pellat, Rachel Hallit, Benoit Terris, Frédéric Prat, Stanislas Chaussade, Romain Coriat and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maxime AmoyelGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France. maximeamoyel@gmail.com.
Arthur BelleGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Marion DhoogeGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Einas Abou AliGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Anna PellatGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Rachel HallitGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Benoit TerrisUniversité de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Frédéric PratGastroenterology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France.
Stanislas ChaussadeGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Romain CoriatGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Maximilien BarretGastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Cochin · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRHôpital Beaujon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the recommended treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors larger than 6 mm. This endoscopic technique carries a high risk of adverse events. Our aim was to identify the risk factors for adverse events following EMR for non-ampullary duodenal adenomatous lesions. We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of consecutive endoscopic resections for duodenal lesions at a tertiary referral center for therapeutic endoscopy. We analyzed patients with non-ampullary duodenal adenomatous lesions ≥ 10 mm resected by EMR, and searched for factors associated with adverse events after EMR. 167 duodenal adenomatous lesions, with a median size of 25 (25-40) mm, were resected by EMR between January 2015 and December 2020. Adverse events occurred in 37/167 (22.2%) after endoscopic resection, with 29/167 (17.4%) delayed bleeding, 4/167 (2.4%) immediate perforation and 4/167 (2.4%) delayed perforation. In logistic regression, the size of the lesion was the only associated risk factor of adverse events (OR = 2.81, 95% CI [1.27; 6.47], p = 0.012). Adverse events increased mean hospitalization time (7.7 ± 9 vs. 1.9 ± 1 days, p < 0.01). None of the currently recommended preventive methods, particularly clips, affected the adverse event rate. EMR of centimetric and supracentimetric duodenal adenomatous lesions carries a high risk of adverse events, increasing with the size of the lesion and with no benefit from any preventive method. These results suggest that these procedures should be performed in expert centers, and underline the need for novel endoscopic tools to limit the rate of adverse events.

Indexed as

AdenomaDuodenal NeoplasmsEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36028514
PMCPMC9418143
OpenAlexW4293116604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.