ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022
Attractor-like Dynamics in the Subicular Complex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial remapping in the subicular complex and entorhinal cortex follows low-dimensional geometric principles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Historical loss weakens competitive behavior by remodeling ventral hippocampal dynamics.Cell discovery · 2025Article
- Environment geometry alters subiculum boundary vector cell receptive fields in adulthood and early development.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distinct computations are performed at multiple brain regions during the encoding of spatial environments. Neural representations in the hippocampal, entorhinal, and head direction (HD) networks during spatial navigation have been clearly documented, while the representational properties of the subicular complex (SC) are relatively underexplored, although it has extensive anatomic connections with various brain regions involved in spatial information processing. We simultaneously recorded single units from different subregions of the SC in male rats while they ran clockwise on a centrally placed textured circular track (four different textures, each covering a quadrant), surrounded by six distal cues. The neural activity was monitored in standard sessions by maintaining the same configuration between the cues, while in cue manipulation sessions, the distal and local cues were either rotated in opposite directions to create a mismatch between them or the distal cues were removed. We report a highly coherent neural representation of the environment and a robust coupling between the HD cells and the spatial cells in the SC, strikingly different from previous reports of coupling between cells from co-recorded sites. Neural representations were (1) originally governed by the distal cues under local-distal cue-conflict conditions, (2) controlled by the local cues in the absence of distal cues, and (3) governed by the cues that are perceived to be stable. We propose that such attractor-like dynamics in the SC might play a critical role in the orientation of spatial representations, thus providing a "reference map" of the environment for further processing by other networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.