ArticleClinical medicine & research2022
Anthropometric Measures for the Prognosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Obese.
Article in Clinical medicine & research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify, among the different anthropometric indicators, the one that shows higher discriminatory power for the prognosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).
designObservational cross-sectional study
participantsObese individuals elective to bariatric surgery
methodsA study based on data of 758 patients aged ≥ 21 years old, of both sexes, in the pre-operatory stage of the surgical procedure of gastric bypass. Obstructive sleep apnea and obstructive sleep hypopnea were evaluated and classified through the apnea-hypopnea index, which was obtained through the examination of polysomnography. Variables were divided into two groups: individuals with and without OSAS. As predictors, measures of body mass index (BMI), neck circumference (NC), and waist circumference (WC) were used.
resultsThe area under the ROC curve was used to check the sensitivity and specificity. All evaluated anthropometric indicators showed statistical significance. WC: area of 0.62 (CI 95%: 0.58 - 0.67), NC: area of 0,68 (CI 95%: 0.64 - 0.72) and BMI: area of 0.58 (CI 95%: 0.54 - 0.63).
conclusionThe investigated anthropometric indicators performed as good predictors of OSAS. However, NC seems to be the best anthropometric indicator for the prognosis of OSAS in obese individuals when compared to BMI and WC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.