Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36028270›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol.

Ana Paula Ribeiro, Marcelo Piquet-Pessôa, Carina Félix-da-Silva, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer Mühlbauer, Juliana B de-Salles-Andrade, Leonardo F Fontenelle

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ana Paula RibeiroObsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) and D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-3538
Marcelo Piquet-PessôaObsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) and D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carina Félix-da-SilvaObsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) and D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Julia Fernandes Eigenheer MühlbauerObsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) and D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Juliana B de-Salles-AndradeObsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) and D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Leonardo F FontenelleObsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) and D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil lfontenelle@medicina.ufrj.br.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both groups of disorders. The present study will describe the research protocol of a scoping review of the literature on self-report scales and questionnaires that tap dysfunctional constructs that underlie OCRDs and DABs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a scoping review on self-report tools and questionnaires that assess OCRDs and DABs-related constructs. The scoping review will select sources in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designed according to the ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for conducting this scoping review is not required, as this study will involve secondary analysis of existing literature. The researchers will disseminate the study results via conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/UJ7G5.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveResearch DesignCompulsive Personality DisorderHumansPeer ReviewScoping Reviews as Topicanxiety disordersimpulse control disorderssubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID36028270
PMCPMC9422856
OpenAlexW4293124540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.