Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018862›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Determinants of coronavirus disease 2019 infection by artificial intelligence technology: A study of 28 countries.

Hsiao-Ya Peng, Yen-Kuang Lin, Phung-Anh Nguyen, Jason C Hsu, Chun-Liang Chou, Chih-Cheng Chang, Chia-Chi Lin, Carlos Lam, Chang-I Chen, Kai-Hsun Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hsiao-Ya PengInternational PhD Program in Biotech and Healthcare Management, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Kuang LinBiostatistics Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Phung-Anh NguyenClinical Data Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jason C HsuInternational PhD Program in Biotech and Healthcare Management, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8710-2338
Chun-Liang ChouDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Cheng ChangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chia-Chi LinInternational PhD Program in Biotech and Healthcare Management, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Carlos LamEmergency Department, Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8051-7485
Chang-I ChenDepartment of Healthcare Administration, School of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-8342
Kai-Hsun WangGraduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Christine Y LuDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has affected countries around the world since 2020, and an increasing number of people are being infected. The purpose of this research was to use big data and artificial intelligence technology to find key factors associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 infection. The results can be used as a reference for disease prevention in practice.

methodsThis study obtained data from the "Imperial College London YouGov Covid-19 Behaviour Tracker Open Data Hub", covering a total of 291,780 questionnaire results from 28 countries (April 1~August 31, 2020). Data included basic characteristics, lifestyle habits, disease history, and symptoms of each subject. Four types of machine learning classification models were used, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and artificial neural network, to build prediction modules. The performance of each module is presented as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. Then, this study further processed important factors selected by each module to obtain an overall ranking of determinants.

resultsThis study found that the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the prediction modules established by the four machine learning methods were all >0.95, and the RF had the highest performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve is 0.988). Top ten factors associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 infection were identified in order of importance: whether the family had been tested, having no symptoms, loss of smell, loss of taste, a history of epilepsy, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, cystic fibrosis, sleeping alone, country, and the number of times leaving home in a day.

conclusionsThis study used big data from 28 countries and artificial intelligence methods to determine the predictors of the coronavirus disease 2019 infection. The findings provide important insights for the coronavirus disease 2019 infection prevention strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Artificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningPandemicsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID36018862
PMCPMC9417026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.