Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effects of three regeneration methods on the growth and bacterial community diversity of Populus × euramericana.

Yanyan Fu, Changjun Ding, Jianmin Fan, Yongtan Li, Lizhu Yao, Minsheng Yang, Xiaohua Su, Jinmao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanyan FuForest Department, Forestry College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Changjun DingState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
Jianmin FanForest Department, Forestry College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Yongtan LiForest Department, Forestry College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Lizhu YaoForest Department, Forestry College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Minsheng YangForest Department, Forestry College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Xiaohua SuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8427-4727
Jinmao WangForest Department, Forestry College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-5906
Hebei Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Forestry · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the effects of different regeneration methods on the growth and bacterial community diversity of Populus × euramericana cv. '74/76' (poplar 107), we investigated the growth of poplar 107 trees under three regeneration methods in 2017 and 2020, and sequenced the 16S rDNA V5-V7 regions in stem endophytic, root endophytic, and rhizosphere soil bacteria present in samples from the three regeneration methods using the Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform. The growth analysis showed that stump grafting regeneration (ST) and stump sprouting regeneration (SP) presented similar tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH), which were significantly lower by planted seedling regeneration (CK). The high-throughput sequencing results showed that the rhizosphere soil bacteria appeared to be significantly more diverse and rich than the root and stem endophytic bacteria. Cluster analysis showed that the similarity of bacterial community structure among the rhizosphere soil, root, and stem was small. Thus, the three sample types showed significant differences in bacteria. While comparing the two years, 2020 was significantly more diverse and rich than 2017. With the increase in stand age, the abundance of Proteobacteria increased and the abundance of Acidobacteria decreased. Among the three regeneration methods, ST significantly increased the diversity of stem endophytic bacteria. Chthoniobacter was enriched in SP, which promoted the decomposition of organic matter, and more plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) were accumulated in the rhizosphere of SP and ST. The composition of the bacterial community was similar in the three regeneration methods, but the community composition was different. Regeneration and transformation of poplar plantations can be better carried out by stump grafting and stump sprouting.

Indexed as

PopulusBacteriaPlant RootsRegenerationRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID36018851
PMCPMC9416986
OpenAlexW4293155365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.