ArticleNucleic acids research2022
Internally controlled RNA sequencing comparisons using nucleoside recoding chemistry.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding and improving analyses of nucleotide recoding RNA-seq experiments with the EZbakR suite.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Determining RNA Natural Modifications and Nucleoside Analog-Labeled Sites by a Chemical/Enzyme-Induced Base Mutation Principle.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative comparisons of RNA levels from different samples can lead to new biological understanding if they are able to distinguish biological variation from variable sample preparation. These challenges are pronounced in comparisons that require complex biochemical manipulations (e.g. isolating polysomes to study translation). Here, we present Transcript Regulation Identified by Labeling with Nucleoside Analogues in Cell Culture (TILAC), an internally controlled approach for quantitative comparisons of RNA content. TILAC uses two metabolic labels, 4-thiouridine (s4U) and 6-thioguanosine (s6G), to differentially label RNAs in cells, allowing experimental and control samples to be pooled prior to downstream biochemical manipulations. TILAC leverages nucleoside recoding chemistry to generate characteristic sequencing signatures for each label and uses statistical modeling to compare the abundance of RNA transcripts between samples. We verified the performance of TILAC in transcriptome-scale experiments involving RNA polymerase II inhibition and heat shock. We then applied TILAC to quantify changes in mRNA association with actively translating ribosomes during sodium arsenite stress and discovered a set of transcripts that are translationally upregulated, including MCM2 and DDX5. TILAC is broadly applicable to uncover differences between samples leading to improved biological insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.