ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient-specific quality assurance in Japan.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A survey of practice patterns for patient-specific quality assurance on behalf of the ESTRO dosimetry & quality assurance focus group.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Dosimetric benefits of half-field arc in prostate cancer treatment.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Survey and profile data on particle therapy technology in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Site-Specific Assessment of Statistical Process Control to Set Tolerance and Action Limits for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance in RapidArc Treatment Delivery.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2025Article
- Development of a database and analytical environment for precision quality management in high-precision radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy dose calculation plans based on kV-cone beam CT images for the breast cancer treatment.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Imaging.Balkan medical journal · 2025Review
- Visualization and evaluation of the quality variations of EBT4 Gafchromic film using multidimensional scaling and Lie derivative image analysis.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Unifying gamma passing rates in patient-specific QA for VMAT lung cancer treatment based on data assimilation.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the helical diode array using volumetric-modulated arc therapy for small targets.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- A virtual audit system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy credentialing in Japan Clinical Oncology Group clinical trials: A pilot study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient-specific quality assurance in Japan.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Article
- Setting the Tolerance and Action Limit for Patient-specific Quality Assurance of Craniospinal Irradiation Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: Based on AAPM TG-218 Report.Journal of medical physicsArticle
- Comparative Study of Fluence Distribution and Point Dose Using Arc-check and DeltaJournal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Task Group 218 (TG-218) report was published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine in 2018, recommending the appropriate use of gamma index analysis for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). The paper demonstrates that PSQA for radiotherapy in Japan appropriately applies the gamma index analysis considering TG-218. MATERIALS/
methodsThis survey estimated the acceptance state of radiotherapeutic institutes or facilities in Japan for the guideline using a web-based questionnaire. To investigate an appropriate PSQA of the facility-specific conditions, we researched an optimal tolerance or action level for various clinical situations, including different treatment machines, clinical policies, measurement devices, staff or their skills, and patient conditions. The responded data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and multidimensional scaling (MDS). The PCA focused on factor loading values of the first contribution over 0.5, whereas the MDS focused on mapped distances among data.
resultsResponses were obtained from 148 facilities that use intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which accounted for 42.8% of the probable IMRT use in Japan. This survey revealed the appropriate application of the following universal criteria for gamma index analysis from the guideline recommendation despite the facility-specific variations (treatment machines/the number of IMRT cases/facility attributes/responded [representative] expertise or staff): (a) 95% pass rate, (b) 3% dose difference and 2-mm distance-to-agreement, and (c) 10% threshold dose. Conditions (a)-(c) were the principal components of the data by the PCA method and were mapped in a similar distance range, which was easily clustered from other gamma index analytic factors by the MDS method. Conditions (a)-(c) were the universally essential factors for the PSQA in Japan.
conclusionWe found that the majority of facilities using IMRT in each region of Japan complied with the guideline and conducted PSQA with deliberation under the individual facility-specific conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.