Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018588›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Analysis of COVID-19 Incidence and Severity Among Adults Vaccinated With 2-Dose mRNA COVID-19 or Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines With and Without Boosters in Singapore.

Oon Tek Ng, Kalisvar Marimuthu, Nigel Lim, Ze Qin Lim, Natascha May Thevasagayam, Vanessa Koh, Calvin J Chiew, Stefan Ma, Mingshi Koh, Pin Yan Low and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on Omicron variant and its threat to vulnerable populations.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Long-term Cardiovascular, Cerebrovascular, and Other Thrombotic Complications in COVID-19 Survivors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Oon Tek NgNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Kalisvar MarimuthuNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Nigel LimSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Ze Qin LimNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Natascha May ThevasagayamNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Vanessa KohNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Calvin J ChiewCommunicable Diseases Division, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Stefan MaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Mingshi KohMinistry of Health, Singapore.
Pin Yan LowMinistry of Health, Singapore.
Say Beng TanNational Medical Research Council, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Joses HoBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore.
Sebastian Maurer-StrohNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Vernon J M LeeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Yee-Sin LeoNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Kelvin Bryan TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Alex R CookSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Chorh Chuan TanOffice of Healthcare Transformation, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Ministry of Health · SGNational University of Singapore · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGNational University Health System · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNanyang Technological University · SGNational Centre for Infectious Diseases · SGSingHealth · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Assessing booster effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine over longer time intervals and in response to any further SARS-CoV-2 variants is crucial in determining optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategies. Objective: To determine levels of protection against severe COVID-19 and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by types and combinations of vaccine boosters in Singapore during the Omicron wave. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included Singapore residents aged 30 years or more vaccinated with either at least 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (ie, Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (Sinovac CoronaVac or Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV) as of March 10, 2022. Individuals with a known SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to December 27, 2021, an infection on or before the date of their second vaccine dose, or with reinfection cases were excluded. Exposures: Two or 3 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273, Sinovac CoronaVac, or Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV. Main Outcomes and Measures: Notified infections from December 27, 2021, to March 10, 2022, adjusted for age, sex, race, housing status, and calendar days. Estimated booster effectiveness, defined as the relative incidence-rate reduction of severe disease (supplemental oxygen, intensive care, or death) or confirmed infection following 3-dose vaccination compared with 5 months after second mRNA dose, was determined using binomial regression. Results: Among 2 441 581 eligible individuals (1 279 047 [52.4%] women, 846 110 (34.7%) aged 60 years and older), there were 319 943 (13.1%) confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, of which 1513 (0.4%) were severe COVID-19 cases. mRNA booster effectiveness against confirmed infection 15 to 60 days after boosting was estimated to range from 31.7% to 41.3% for the 4 boosting combinations (homologous BNT162b2, homologous mRNA-1273, 2-dose BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 booster, and 2-dose mRNA-1273/BNT162b2 booster). Five months and more after boosting, estimated booster effectiveness against confirmed infection waned, ranging from -2.8% to 14.6%. Against severe COVID-19, estimated mRNA booster effectiveness was 87.4% (95% CI, 83.3%-90.5%) 15 to 60 days after boosting and 87.2% (95% CI, 84.2%-89.7%) 5 to 6 months after boosting, with no significant difference comparing vaccine combinations. Booster effectiveness against severe COVID-19 15 days to 330 days after 3-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of combination, was estimated to be 69.6% (95% CI, 48.7%-81.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: Booster mRNA vaccine protection against severe COVID-19 was estimated to be durable over 6 months. Three-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination provided greater protection than 2-dose but weaker protection compared with 3-dose mRNA.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAgedBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2SingaporeVaccines, SyntheticBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36018588
PMCPMC9419014
OpenAlexW4293124974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.