ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2023
Ataxia Rating Scales Reveal Increased Scores in Very Preterm Born 5-6-Year-Old Preschool Children and Young Adults.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of physical activity and fitness for children's wellbeing and academic achievement.Pediatric research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate whether scores in ataxia rating scales (ARS) are different in very preterm (VP) preschool and adult participants compared to term controls. This is a case-control study. Sixty VP children (years: 5.5-6.5; gestational age: 23.9-31.7 weeks) and 56 VP adults (years: 17.8-27.9; gestational age: 23.3-32.0 weeks) without major cerebral lesions participated in the study; 60-age and sex-matched term children and 64 term adults for comparison were used in the study intervened with the assessment with International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Main outcome measures are primary outcome: total icars and sara scores in preterm (vp) participants versus controls. Results showed that VP children showed significantly higher total ICARS (M 15.98, SD 6.29, range 4.0-32.0; p < .001) and SARA scores (M 6.5, SD 2.53, range 1.0-15.0; p < .001) than controls (ICARS: M 9.17, SD 3.88, range 2.0-20.0; SARA: M 3.51, SD 1.54, range 1.0-8.0). VP adults also showed significantly higher total ICARS (M 1.0, SD 1.99, range 0.0-11.0; p < .001) and SARA scores (M 0.54, SD 1.08, range 0.0-6.0; p < .001) than controls (ICARS: M 0.11, SD 0.44, range 0.0-2.0; SARA: M 0.04, SD 0.18, range 0.0-1.0). In conclusion, VP children showed significantly higher scores in ARS than controls. These differences were also present in VP adults, suggesting that deficits likely prevail until adulthood. ARS are a time and cost-effective method to screen for difficulties in coordination and balance in a patient group at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.