Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018527›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2022

Cutting edge rare earth radiometals: prospects for cancer theranostics.

Alexander W E Sadler, Leena Hogan, Benjamin Fraser, Louis M Rendina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiotheranostic landscape: A review of clinical and preclinical development.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  6. Scalability study on [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  8. Rare Earths-The Answer to Everything.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Effect of GdMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander W E SadlerSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Leena HoganANSTO Life Sciences, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Kirrawee, NSW, 2232, Australia.
Benjamin FraserANSTO Life Sciences, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Kirrawee, NSW, 2232, Australia.
Louis M RendinaSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. louis.rendina@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-6817
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP190103461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith recent advances in novel approaches to cancer therapy and imaging, the application of theranostic techniques in personalised medicine has emerged as a very promising avenue of research inquiry in recent years. Interest has been directed towards the theranostic potential of Rare Earth radiometals due to their closely related chemical properties which allow for their facile and interchangeable incorporation into identical bifunctional chelators or targeting biomolecules for use in a diverse range of cancer imaging and therapeutic applications without additional modification, i.e. a "one-size-fits-all" approach. This review will focus on recent progress and innovations in the area of Rare Earth radionuclides for theranostic applications by providing a detailed snapshot of their current state of production by means of nuclear reactions, subsequent promising theranostic capabilities in the clinic, as well as a discussion of factors that have impacted upon their progress through the theranostic drug development pipeline. MAIN BODY: In light of this interest, a great deal of research has also been focussed towards certain under-utilised Rare Earth radionuclides with diverse and favourable decay characteristics which span the broad spectrum of most cancer imaging and therapeutic applications, with potential nuclides suitable for α-therapy (

conclusionsIn order to exploit the potential of these radionuclides, reliable and economical production and purification methods that provide the desired radionuclides in high yield and purity are required. With more reactors around the world being decommissioned in future, solutions to radionuclide production issues will likely be found in a greater focus on linear accelerator and cyclotron infrastructure and production methods, as well as mass separation methods. Recent progress towards the optimisation of these and other radionuclide production and purification methods has increased the feasibility of utilising Rare Earth radiometals in both preclinical and clinical settings, thereby placing them at the forefront of radiometals research for cancer theranostics.

Indexed as

CancerImagingLanthanoidRadionuclide productionRare earthTheranosticsTherapy

Identifiers

PMID36018527
PMCPMC9418400
OpenAlexW4293116442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.