Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018476›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2023

Pilot study of facial and bodily feedback.

Chloë Hutchings-Hay, Marcela M Dapelo, Gisselle Briceño, Camila Fernández, Kate Tchanturia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chloë Hutchings-HayDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-7360
Marcela M DapeloEating Behaviour Program, Mental Health Service, Clinica Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-1295
Gisselle BriceñoSchool of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Camila FernándezSchool of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Kate TchanturiaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-3265

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S020381/1MRC-MRF Fund MR/S020381/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe modulation hypothesis of facial feedback has not adequately examined how combining facial expressions and bodily postures might influence our experience of emotional stimuli. This pilot study examined a new method for manipulating both face and body together, which is important in furthering our understanding of how face and body interact to influence emotional experiences in the real world.

methodsUsing a within-subjects design, 30 participants viewed positive film clips under four conditions: (1) positive face with positive body (PP), (2) positive face with neutral body (PN), (3) neutral face with positive body (NP) and (4) neutral face with neutral body (NN). Measures of positive and negative affect were taken before and after each clip, to assess the subjective emotional experience.

resultsRepeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine differences in the emotional experience under each condition. Post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that positive affect in the PP condition was significantly higher than in the NP and NN conditions. There was no significant difference between the PP and NN conditions.

conclusionWhilst the study findings are difficult to interpret, this pilot study generated a number of important methodological learnings that are relevant to future research of this kind.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial ExpressionAffectFeedbackPilot ProjectsPostureBodily postureFacial feedback hypothesisModulationPositive affectSmile

Identifiers

PMID36018476
PMCPMC10238286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.