Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018442›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2023

Dividend policy issues in the European pharmaceutical industry: new empirical evidence.

Tobias Basse, Christoph Schwarzbach, J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias BasseNorddeutsche Landesbank (NORD/LB), Friedrichswall 10, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
Christoph SchwarzbachInstitute of Information Systems Research, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Koenigsworther Platz 1, 30167, Hannover, Germany. schwarzbach@iwi.uni-hannover.de.
J-Matthias Graf von der SchulenburgInstitute for Risk and Insurance, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
Leibniz University Hannover · DEBard College Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines dividend policy issues in the European pharmaceutical industry. This sector is of particular interest because of the high research and development expenditures and the associated risks characterizing the business models of many firms in this industry. In fact, from the perspective of corporate finance theory, this is a particular challenge for the managers of these corporations that may also have implications for the dividend policy implemented by the firms forming this sector. Moreover, the level of internal financing and litigation risks also seem to be high in the pharmaceutical industry. These facts could also affect the payout policy of the firms. Employing techniques of time series analysis, there is no evidence for dividend signaling and clear evidence for dividend smoothing in the European pharmaceutical industry. Given that dividend increases under certain assumptions can negatively affect the firms' ability to finance new investments in general and research and development projects in particular, these results of our empirical investigations could be described as highly plausible.

Indexed as

CommerceMedicineChinaDrug IndustryHumansPolicyDividend policyGranger causalityHealth care firmsLitigation riskPharmaceutical industryResearch and development expenditures

Identifiers

PMID36018442
PMCPMC10198850
OpenAlexW4293109615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.