Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36018380›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Urolithiasis-Therapy and recurrence prevention taking into account gender-specific aspects].

Roswitha Siener, Walter L Strohmaier, Andreas Neisius

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roswitha SienerUniversitäres Steinzentrum, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. roswitha.siener@ukbonn.de.
Walter L StrohmaierMedical School Regiomed, Regiomed-Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Deutschland.
Andreas NeisiusAbteilung für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Medizincampus der Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Trier, Deutschland.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DEUniversity of Split · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of urolithiasis is steadily increasing worldwide in both genders. Diet and lifestyle, such as the rising prevalence of obesity and other metabolic syndrome traits, are considered key factors in this trend. Gender differences as a result of interventional therapy for urolithiasis have not been observed. However, iatrogenic injury to the male urethra is considered the most common reason for urethral strictures after endourologic (stone) therapy. In contrast, sepsis, as the major cause of urinary stone-related mortality, is more frequently reported in women after ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. There are also differences in the frequency of various types of stones between men and women. Calcium oxalate and uric acid stones are more commonly observed in men, while carbonate apatite and struvite are diagnosed more often in women. Urinary stone analysis is therefore paramount for successful recurrence prevention. Diagnosis is based on the assignment of patients to the low-risk or high-risk group. The medical nutrition and pharmacological measures for the therapy of the respective type of stone are based on the risk factors in 24 h urine samples. A personalized approach that accounts for gender differences could further improve treatment, and recurrence prevention decisions for urinary stones.

Indexed as

Urinary CalculiUrolithiasisCalcium OxalateFemaleHumansMaleStruviteUric AcidCalcium OxalateStruviteUric AcidDietMedicationSexStone analysisUrinary stones

Identifiers

PMID36018380
OpenAlexW4293206763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.